tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post8044687789058354167..comments2023-07-04T12:59:09.183+02:00Comments on Process Developments: Process Modelling And Process ExecutionTom Baeyenshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03067067751334471585noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-55703678392246593662008-03-07T10:18:00.000+01:002008-03-07T10:18:00.000+01:00makign a differentiation between the 'front door' ...makign a differentiation between the 'front door' of the API and the 'back doors' is a major goal of the jPDL 4.<BR/><BR/>the idea is that we'll build a command based session facade in front of the jbpm-context-blocks. that should make it a lot easier.<BR/><BR/>also the pluggable architecture will be changed from composition to inheritence. that should get rid of the hoops over context instance to get to the process variables. also it will increase the db performance significantly.<BR/><BR/>regrettably, these kind of changes can not be done without breaking backwards compatibility. we will keep supporting jbpm 3.x series. but most of the new developments will go to the new versions based on the pvm.Tom Baeyenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03067067751334471585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-30126270555772390992008-03-06T20:34:00.000+01:002008-03-06T20:34:00.000+01:00Is the JBPM/JPDL 4 API surface (for use with JPDL ...Is the JBPM/JPDL 4 API surface (for use with JPDL processes) going to be a substantial rewrite, or is there a requirement for the API to be substantially backward-compatible?<BR/><BR/>I'm hoping that interfaces will be used to help steer authors to use the API correctly - this would be a significant departure from JBPM/JPDL 3.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-15959568447788745462008-01-27T20:29:00.000+01:002008-01-27T20:29:00.000+01:00If you start your project now, you still have to s...If you start your project now, you still have to start with jBPM 3.<BR/><BR/>The first releases of the Process Virtual Machine are expected in a month or two.<BR/><BR/>After that, we'll start on jPDL. That will take another couple of months.Tom Baeyenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03067067751334471585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-76839088760460604842008-01-27T16:44:00.000+01:002008-01-27T16:44:00.000+01:00Is there any roadmap for JBPM 4, how process is go...Is there any roadmap for JBPM 4, how process is going, any sugestions for new projects (do we need to wait to JBPM4 showup or we can depend now on JBPM3, any migration paths)?<BR/>Thank you for your atension.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com