tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post8083007699444496532..comments2023-07-04T12:59:09.183+02:00Comments on Process Developments: BPM And Fruit NinjaTom Baeyenshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03067067751334471585noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-6488073793351684282013-05-22T09:43:28.634+02:002013-05-22T09:43:28.634+02:00I agree it's impossible to build one generic B...I agree it's impossible to build one generic BPM system that includes integration for technical people and still keep it simple enough for business people. <br /><br />But imagine a tool that only allows to specify tasks with forms, handovers and escalations. By restricting the featureset offered to business people, it can become simple enough so that business people can build meaningfull and executable processes. <br /><br />Once people get started with the simple approach, then there is indeed often the desire for further customization. That still needs to be possible and that always requires tech skills to put it in production. But at the moment, a lot of processes are just ignored because it takes an IT project to automate a process. Even if there are some limitations to it, it makes sense for business people to start to automating processes.Tom Baeyenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03067067751334471585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4309414151374220630.post-58475159791630923042013-05-22T09:31:52.399+02:002013-05-22T09:31:52.399+02:00To my experience, business people are not trained ...To my experience, business people are not trained to work with the extreme rigor that's needed handling automatic processes. They tend to mask all the odd things that seem "unlikely" to them. All I've seen was to let them develop proposels and give these propsals to a team of IT-engineers to check and correct them. And there is hardly one passing unmodified into production.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com